Commentaries

May 25, 2024

Raisi’s Death and Its Ripple Effects in Iran’s Political Landscape

by CASPRI

The recent tragic death of Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi in a helicopter crash has potential far-reaching implications for Iran’s internal politics and its relationships with neighboring countries. Raisi’s death occurs against a backdrop of significant infrastructural cooperation with Azerbaijan, highlighted by the joint commissioning of the Khudaferin and Giz Galasy hydroelectric complexes on the Araz River. This event symbolized a high point in bilateral relations following a brief period of tension, demonstrating a mutual commitment to overcoming regional challenges through strategic partnerships.

The convergence of interests between Tehran and Baku has been crucial, particularly in stabilizing a region where external influences often exacerbate geopolitical tensions. Both leaders’ acknowledgment of the necessity for regional autonomy in solving local issues reflects a shared strategic vision, which is rare in the volatile geopolitical climate of the Middle East and the Caucasus.

However, Raisi’s sudden death casts a shadow over this burgeoning alliance, with potential implications for ongoing and future projects that are pivotal for both countries’ economic and strategic interests. The timing of his death—shortly after endorsing significant bilateral initiatives—injects uncertainty into these collaborative ventures, possibly stalling the momentum gained from recent diplomatic engagements.

The dynamics within Iran following Raisi’s death will likely catalyze shifts in the internal power structure. As the second most powerful figure in Iran after Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Raisi was viewed as a potential successor. His involvement in high-level diplomatic and infrastructural projects was part of a broader strategy to solidify Iran’s regional influence and stabilize its internal political landscape amidst sanctions and external pressures.

Raisi’s initiatives, such as Iran’s membership in the SCO and BRICS, enhancing relations with the EAEU, and restoring oil production levels, were significant in reasserting Iran’s economic and geopolitical stance. His death may create a vacuum that exacerbates the power struggle within Iran’s political elite, complicating the succession dynamics. Speculations about Mohammed-Bagher Ghalibaf, the current speaker of the Iranian parliament, as a presidential candidate, underscore the potential for significant political realignment. Ghalibaf’s established managerial track record and his alliances, notably with Mojtaba Khamenei, hint at a possible consolidation of power that might mirror past dynastic tendencies, reminiscent of the Shah’s regime.

Furthermore, the nature of Raisi’s death has fueled a flurry of conspiracy theories and speculative blame, notably from external observers and media. The timing and context have led to various narratives, some positing that external actors might exploit the incident to drive a wedge between Iran and its neighbors, particularly Azerbaijan. Such speculations not only impact diplomatic relations but also feed into the internal narrative battles within Iran, where factions might leverage the incident to gain or consolidate power.

The broader implication of Raisi’s death extends beyond immediate political succession. It poses questions about the continuity of Iran’s foreign policy, particularly its approach to regional cooperation and conflict. With Azerbaijan, the shared projects and strategic alignments are at a juncture where either continuity or reevaluation could take precedence, depending on the new leadership’s vision and the influence of internal and external pressures.

In essence, while Raisi’s death is a pivotal event for Iranian politics, it is also a litmus test for the resilience of Iran’s foreign policy strategies and its regional alliances. How Iran navigates this period of transition could redefine its role on the regional and global stage, influencing everything from energy corridors in the Caucasus to broader geopolitical alignments involving major powers.